The San Francisco Budget Committee axed funding for the implementation of RFIDs at the San Francisco Public Library. (Link to story).
This reminded me of an interesting post on the LITA Blog on an RFID presentation at ALA. One of the speakers was Berkely Public Library director, Jackie Griffith.
Griffith says that a bigger intellectual freedom issue is access to information. Many public schools in Berkeley lack media specialists and 30% of Berkleyans do not have a computer at home. If there is such a concern that library rfid tags may be used by the government to interfere with things people read then the real question is what the government is doing. Griffith says that RFID has allowed the Berkeley Public Library to reopen on Sundays and to return their book purchasing budget to near normal levels.
I am not an expert on RFIDs, but I don’t really think it’s fair to pit one intellectual freedom issue with another, in order to sweep the “less pressing” issue under the rug. And I think it may also be short sighted to say that the use of technology has allowed the library to save money (and reopen on Sundays). The RFID implementation doesn’t deal with the underlying issue of library underfunding and thus has only postponed budget problems that are sure to reappear in the near future, as well as privacy issues, if RFIDs turn out to be not as safe as they ought to be.