LibrarianActivist.org


Archive for June, 2008


The Seoul Declaration on the Future of the Internet Economy

In June, the OECD had a Ministerial Conference on the Future of the Internet Economy. They published a report which is intended to help countries shape policies concerning the Internet economy. The themes that are addressed are the following:

  • Making Internet access available to everyone and everywhere.
  • Promoting Internet-based innovation, competition and user choice.
  • Securing critical information infrastructures and responding to new threats.
  • Ensuring the protection of personal information, respect for intellectual property rights, and more generally a trusted Internet-based environment which offers protection to individuals, especially minors and other vulnerable groups.
  • Promoting secure and responsible use of the Internet; and,
  • Creating an environment that encourages infrastructure investment, higher levels of connectivity and innovative services and applications.

There were some positive policy suggestions that were made, such as:

  • Promote a culture of openness and sharing of research data among public research communities.
  • Raise awareness of the potential costs and benefits of restrictions and limitations on access to and sharing of research data from public funding.

The OECD Civil Society Forum, comprised of the OECD Civil Society Reference Group and the The Trade Union Advisory Committee, produced a paper (and their own conference) intended to bring to the attention of the OECD Ministers assembled and the OECD member countries the concerns of those not represented at the Ministerial conference.

Their paper highlights the following:

The policy goals for the Future Internet Economy should be considered within the broader framework of protection of human rights, the promotion of democratic institutions, access to information, and the provision of affordable and non-discriminatory access to advanced communication networks and services.

Their recommendations cover

  • Freedom of expression
  • Protection of Privacy and Transparency
  • Consumer Protection
  • Promotion of Access to Knowledge
  • Internet Governance
  • Promotion of Open Standards and Net Neutrality
  • Balanced Intellectual Property Policies
  • Support for Pluralistic Media

Net Neutrality a major issue, say CRTC and Competition Bureau

The Canadian Telecom Summmit has allowed the Chairman of the CRTC, Konrad von Finckenstein, and the head of Canada’s Competition Bureau, Sheridan Scott, to bring Net Neutrality to the forefront as “one of the polarizing issues of the day [that] will have to be addressed and debated.” The CRTC is perhaps planning on holding a “major public consultation in order to obtain the views of interested parties.” Thankfully, the CLA and BCLA recently voted on a Net Neutrality Resolution. (see also the BCLA backgrounder (pdf) nicely put together by Devon Greyson)

SaveOurNet (here and here) and Michael Geist have more to say on the CRTC and Competition Bureau speeches.

In the meantime, SaveOurNet is having a party on Sunday June 22 to strategize about the next steps that need to be taken. The discussion will be led by Steve Anderson from the SaveOurnet.ca Coalition and Campaign for Democratic Media.

The death of SearchEngine: what’s wrong with the CBC?

CBC’s radio show Search Engine is the most downloaded show on the CBC website in the News and Current Affairs section. It has won awards in the US and has a large following on Facebook and on their own website. It’s covered issues like Net Neutrality and Copyright, with the last show covering an interview with Minister of Industry Jim Prentice on Bill C-61.

What does the CBC do in the face of such success?

They cancel the show.

A blogger in Calgary has great ideas on how to make sure this show stays alive. Here’s a great quote from his blog:

(…)canceling CBC Search Engine is like extinguishing a bright torch in our digital democracy. If we want Canadians to stay informed and be engaged in well-reasoned debate, we can’t afford to see shows like Search Engine, an intensely focused source of information, be canceled.

He suggests calling CBC Audience Relations at 1-866-306-4636 to tell them what Search Engine means to you. Ask the operate to enter your comments into the system for the record. You could also write the CBC. I also think that someone absolutely needs to create a Facebook group. Please join the Facebook group or write a petition! Possible people to write to include Richard Stursberg, Executive Vice-President of English Services (Richard.Stursberg@cbc.ca) or Susan Mitton, Executive director of CBC English Radio, (Susan.Mitton@cbc.ca)

Please help save Search Engine!

CanWest and Free Speech

I have been remiss in not posting several important CLA/BCLA resolutions that have passed at their respective AGMs in May, one of which is a Resolution on CanWest and Free Speech. This resolution essentially asks that CanWest “withdraw its legal suit against Mordecai Briemberg and the others charged with having produced a parody of The Vancouver Sun in June 2007.” Both BCLA and CLA have written a letter to CanWest asking them to retract the lawsuit (which is a SLAPP).

Of interest perhaps is the recent book (Oct. 2007) written by Marc Edge, called Asper Nation, on the topic of the CanWest empire.

Questioning Library Neutrality

In April 2008, Library Juice Press published a collection of essays entitled “Questioning Library Neutrality: Essays from Progressive Librarian.” Jeff Lilburn has written a great review for the book for LibrarianActivist. Here’s a quote from the review:

The debate over neutrality in librarianship is one that has been ongoing for many decades and the essays collected here represent an important part of that debate. Lewis’ volume deserves to be required reading in all LIS programs.

Jeff Lilburn is a Public Services Librarian at Mount Allison University and has been interested in library neutrality for some time now. He has written on the topic in both the Feliciter and Progressive Librarian.

P2P wiki

As blogged about on BoingBoing, a wiki has been created listing legitimate uses of P2P. It would be great to create an educational section with examples of the use of P2P in an academic setting.