LibrarianActivist.org


Archive for April, 2007


Taking information into your own hands.

Chip Ward’s illuminating article on how the library has become a de facto ’shelter’ in place of the state’s shrunken safety net provides an excellent opportunity to look at how ppl who are often perceived as non-citizens, non-persons, non-existant nuisances in the collective conscience are reclaiming their power and identities.

Here are some props to ‘information’ efforts that seek to give voiceless groups space to speak for themselves by putting the media in their own hands.

First is Homeless Nation, a Canada wide non-profit organization that provides an online community and forum for homeless people to express their point of view, and an opportunity for the public to interact with and learn some things about being homeless in Canada. Launched in [June] no, April of 2006, membership has grown to over 2000 participants.

Mentions of Homeless Nation in the media can be found here and here and in Rabble podcasts here.

Second is an archives that is documenting the history and cultural heritage of people who’ve been in contact with the psychiatric system.

Librarians, carve out a wee moment in your hectic schedules check out the Psychiatric Survivor Archives, Toronto. It’s a forum and space that aims to preserve the history of psychiatric survivors for current and future generations. PSAT seeks to create an opportunity to restore a sense of agency and personhood to psychiatric survivors, to value their lived experience, history and culture, and to engage a voiceless and stigmatized population in the democratic process of self expression.

Articles here and here published recently in the Toronto Star speak to MAD pride, a movement akin to the ‘queering’ of gay/lesbian culture.

- PC

Librivox and CivicAccess

Here is a rad and inspiring interview with Hugh McGuire, founder and Head Rockstar of Librivox. What a good, good man.

At the end of the show, he talks about where the “Librivox model” can go, and brings up the need to make basic data available to the public for urban planning, environment, health, and political purposes. One group that’s working on making such data available in the public domain is CivicAccess. They’re currently trying to make electoral information freely available to everyone who wants to use it because, at present, the database that links postal codes to electoral information (e.g. based on your postal code, who’s your MP?) is a licensed one. And the license ain’t cheap — it starts at $2900 — fine for marketing companies but not so accessible for citizens’ and not-for-profit groups. CivicAcces want to do the same with the 2006 StatsCan Census information and other civic data. More good people!

-SIO

The Worst Survey Ever

The Alberta government is currently travelling the province asking for input for its Climate Change Strategy. For those who are unable to attend the consultations, the government has designed an online survey which asks what steps the government should take (short of legislation, essentially) to curb provincial pollution and emissions, as well as what steps individuals should take. The survey is basically a checklist of things individuals can do to reduce their ecological footprints and there is little mention of regulating or addressing the enormous problems created by the oil/gas and industrial agriculture sectors.

The first question-statement in the survey is “Alberta will maintain a vibrant economy and high quality of life while addressing this global issue.” That sets out the priorities, doesn’t it?

According to a study published last month by PollutionWatch (a joint project of the Canadian Environmental Law Association and Environmental Defense), Alberta is the national leader in air pollutants (producing 27% of the national total in 2005) and greenhouse gas emissions (a whopping 40% of the national total!) — all this in a province that is home for only 10% of the country’s population. Question three in the survey reads “Alberta will lead Canadian provinces in the use of renewable and alternative energy sources.” Not bloody likely.

I’m going to ask the local libraries to publicize these data for the hearings — and to encourage their patrons to participate. We’re being told by the government that we’re the cleanest, greenest, most enviro-friendly province in the country. What’s up with the Conservatives doing the greenwash thing? I reckon it’s simply the easiest way to distract everyone while they continue with business as usual, maintaining that “vibrant economy and high quality of life.”

The survey should be used as the model for manipulative survey design in library school Research Methods courses: how you can manipulate the answers by framing the questions. The survey is well-worth the read.

-SIO

“Don’t Mind Me, I’m Dead” - The Library and Homelessness

An article about the shift in the role of public library from “library” to “homeless shelter”. (via MetaFilter which, as always, has lots of good discussion around all aspects of this issue.)

- JH

Watching how Orwell would have been watched

These are the surveillance cameras in George Orwell’s London neighbourhood.

funny, and ironically disturbing.

addendum: on second thought, it’s just plain disturbing -PC

via Digg and thisislondon

-PC

Friday “not so fun” Link

David Byrne, probably one of the savviest and most intelligent musicians out there, runs a hell of a blog where he talks about just about everything. This week’s post is particularly interesting, dealing with web radio and musician royalties, and the whole sordid mess we are travelling towards.
Enjoy
_DJ_

Friday Fun Link - “Otters Holding Hands” (April 6, 2007)

This is really cute and fun:


Don McKay shortlisted for Griffin

From the CBC of course:
http://www.cbc.ca/arts/books/story/2007/04/03/griffin-poetry-shortlist.html

Ok, I know this doesn’t have much to do with Librarian Activism, but isn’t poetry an “alternative” media at this point in time? Especially when it is really good poetry? I mean, if I have a choice between reading about Keith Richard’s snorting his dad’s ashes (hoax?) and a genuine amazing Canadian Poet being nominated for Canada’s biggest poetry prize for the third time no less, I’ll take the poet. Maybe think of this as a Wednesday Fun poetry link.
(Plus Kitty of Brick Books has given me and many, many others a lot of free books out of sheer generosity).

Ken Babstock who is also a really fantastic poet, has been nominated as well.

Just go and read some poetry!

Here I’ll start:

Meditation on Blue

By Don McKay

Irresistible, on this atmospheric planet, where
there’s a blue to carry the heart home and a blue
for virgins and a blue to call
the spider from the drain.
Nobody argues with its
shameless imitation of love, diving
simultaneously into the eye and out of sight: sea,
sky, the absence of convulsions and flags,
our own errata winking at us out of depths or heights.
Knowing that one day we will fall to black
or fade to grey, and blue
has been both places and includes them
as a saxophone includes its drastic
possibilities. It’s with us.
We’ve been gone before.

_DJ_

Google Explains Images

I haven’t had a chance to read this, but here is Google’s explanation of the Katrina images from the Google blog:

About the New Orleans imagery in Google Maps and Earth
Monday, April 02, 2007 at 6:50:00 AM
Posted by John Hanke, Director, Google Maps/Local/Earth

This weekend, there has been a lot of discussion about our imagery of New Orleans in Google Maps and Google Earth. I thought I’d give you some background that may clear things up, and also let you know about new imagery of the region now available.

In 2005, shortly after Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, a very motivated group of volunteers at Google worked with NOAA, NASA, and others to post updated imagery of the affected areas in Google Maps and Google Earth as quickly as possible. This data served as a useful reference for many people — from those interested in understanding what had happened, to friends and families checking on the status of loved ones and property, to rescuers and relief workers. Shortly after the event, we received a voicemail thanking us for the role Google Earth played in guiding rescuers to stranded victims.

Several months later, in September 2006, the storm imagery was replaced with pre-Katrina aerial photography of much higher resolution as part of a regular series of global data enhancements. We continued to make available the Katrina imagery, and associated overlays such as damage assessments and Red Cross shelters, on a dedicated site (earth.google.com/katrina.html). Our goal throughout has been to produce a global earth database of the best quality — accounting for timeliness, resolution, cloud cover, light conditions, and color balancing.

Given that the changes that affected New Orleans happened many months ago, we were a bit surprised by some of these recent comments. Nevertheless, we recognize the increasingly important role that imagery is coming to play in the public discourse, and so we’re happy to say that we have been able to expedite the processing of recent (2006) aerial photography for the Gulf Coast area (already in process for an upcoming release) that is equal in resolution to the data it is replacing. That new data was published in Google Earth and Google Maps on Sunday evening.

Make no mistake, this wasn’t any effort on our part to rewrite history. But it looks like this April Fool’s joke was on us.

_DJ_

Google Maps Whitewashing New Orleans Destruction?

Seems that Google has been engaging in some creative geography by replacing pictures of New Orleans post-Katrina with pre-hurricane images. It seems pretty obvious that this is just a tad unethical and maybe whitewashes the destruction just a little? I’m not too worried about a complete lack of information about what happened at that time, but there is some sense that this skews the historical record maybe just a little?

_DJ_

From the excellent Question Technology Blog

Google Maps and Responsibility

Google is getting questioned over why they replaced post-Katrina satellite images showing New Orleans devastation with older, pre-Katrina images. Was it just an innocent mistake? From today’s SF Chronicle/AP:

Google’s replacement of post-Hurricane Katrina satellite imagery on its map portal with images of the region before the storm does a “great injustice” to the storm’s victims, a congressional subcommittee said.

The House Committee on Science and Technology’s subcommittee on investigations and oversight on Friday asked Google Inc. Chairman and CEO Eric Schmidt to explain why his company is using the outdated imagery.

The subcommittee cited an Associated Press report on the images.

“Google’s use of old imagery appears to be doing the victims of Hurricane Katrina a great injustice by airbrushing history,” subcommittee chairman Brad Miller, D-N.C., wrote in a letter to Schmidt.

Swapping the post-Katrina images and the ruin they revealed for others showing an idyllic city dumbfounded many locals and even sparked suspicions that the company and civic leaders were conspiring to portray the area’s recovery progressing better than it is. [...]

After Katrina, Google’s satellite images were in high demand among exiles and hurricane victims anxious to see whether their homes were damaged.

Now, though, a virtual trip through New Orleans is a surreal experience of scrolling across a landscape of packed parking lots and marinas full of boats.

Reality, of course, is very different: Entire neighborhoods are now slab mosaics where houses once stood and shopping malls, churches and marinas are empty of life, many gone altogether.

John Hanke, Google’s director for maps and satellite imagery, said “a combination of factors including imagery date, resolution, and clarity” go into deciding what imagery to provide.

“The latest update from one of our information providers substantially improved the imagery detail of the New Orleans area,” Hanke said in a news release about the switch.

Kovacs said efforts are under way to use more current imagery. [...]

Edith Holleman, staff counsel for the House subcommittee, said it would be useful to understand how Google acquires and manages its imagery because “people see Google and other Internet engines and it’s almost like the official word.”

Link: Congressional subcommittee criticizes Google pre-Katrina images.

Lauren Weinstein calls it a bum rap:

Greetings. I know a bum rap when I see one. People who should know better — such as the House Committee on Science and Technology’s subcommittee on investigations and oversight chairman Brad Miller, D-North Carolina — are accusing Google of “airbrushing” history on Google Maps. [...]

Google says that one of their imagery suppliers switched to older data that was higher resolution. Balancing timeliness of data with resolution is a non-trivial task for a mapping site, and in retrospect perhaps some sort of exception should have been carved out for that region when the changes went live, but hindsight is 20/20.

Link: Lauren Weinstein’s Blog: Google Getting a Bum Rap Over Hurricane Katrina Images.

I’m sure this was unintentional, but I don’t think it’s a bad idea to make Google answer questions about it and take some responsibility. This is not the first time Google has tried to hide behind algorithms in response to questions about controversial results (see earlier posts: Google correctness, Computers are the new authorities).

We know that there’s some human selection going on with satellite images (to remove photos of military sites, for example). Does Google do any of that or is it all done by the data suppliers? Google needs to be more open about their processes. The statement above by Edith Holleman has it exactly right.

On a more technical note, how about a button in Google Maps to show dates on the satellite photos? That’s clearly an important piece of the information for users to know.

Posted by Kevin Arthur at 10:55 AM in Computers, Culture, Media, Politics, Science, Society, Technology | Permalink